安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/groups/SteamClientBeta/discussions/
it is where they track all of this kind of thing
even if it is in the released version
I have no hope they will fix this bug anytime soon, because the main reason why they moved to CEF was because they don't have competent devs anymore, so I don't really care enough to re-post. If they don't want people to buy from them because they can't bother to fix a single line of code, there are other stores that actually care about money.
Yes, that first sentence is a little weird, I find it quite strange that hitting the Help button within the Steam client CAN NEVER EVER IN ANY CONTEXT direct you to a person who works at Valve in a capacity to respond to errors encountered within the Steam client. It is totally baffling to me but I suppose I simply have talent and standards.
https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/discussions/forum/10/135507548120407092/
/
The first reply was correct of you having better luck in the beta forum.
That sounds to me like this is actually the best way place to put this thread. It concerns a store feature improvement.
It is quite silly but outsourced support means OUTSOURCED TOTALLY, sadly.
I will never understand the habit on this forum people have of posting quotes that they do not read for comprehension, but it explains why I so often have to correct them on questions of Valve's stated policies.
Nevertheless, what IS true is that the "Steam Beta Client" forum actually sees Valve employees respond sometimes, the sorts of people who can address specific errors such as these, while this forum will never see them. It may be an idiotic state of affairs but it is the truth here.
Odd comment seeing as how you told the OP of the refund warning thread to ignore it despite them posting the actual message from Steam Support.
https://psteamcommunity.yuanyoumao.com/discussions/forum/10/4751949102179888843/#c4751949102180999647
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/PerformanceObserver
Mozilla documents this API as being available in all major browsers in the past half-decade.
If you break things, things will be broken. That's just basic cause and effect.
Disabling an optional flag is not "breaking" anything. PerformanceObserver is a telemetry tool that gathers information about how well/bad the application (it's mostly meant for web apps, not websites) performs. Disabling it should not break anything; at best, it should log an error and move on, at worst, it should tell the user to enable the flag (if the method was actually necessary, which it isn't). It is absolutely unnecessary to crash the entire set of functions it the flag is disabled... which is evident due to how the method is actually in a try...catch statement on some pages (eg. wishlist) and those pages work. It's bad coding.
It matters because i do not have the issue you are describing on Vivaldi.
Anyway, since they are probably not going to fix it anytime soon, if anybody else has this issue, here's a quick script to fix it client-side:
I did not mess with the settings causing the issue you have and blaming it on bad coding.
Because it is a discussion forum and when the thread title reads: Store website broken due to faulty telemetry use i pointed out i do not have this issue whereas you deem the issue was relevant to everyone.
You even wrote:
I did not change any setting causing it to break.