安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Signed, not a moderator or moderator controlled account
3rd party moderators hired by valve or anyone can be a mod hub moderator?
Yes, attacking people without evidence and repeatedly claiming abuse and fraud without evidence would indeed be an unethical thing to say.
Ironically if one users constant false predictions about Section 230 ever come to pass its also one that can result in personal liability and a lawsuit against you.
Do you have evidence to back up your claim? Oh! Wait what am I saying. You never do, just conjecture, speculation and conspiracy.
Oh! The irony of creating multiple threads related solely to conjecture, speculation and conspiracy, none related to gaming.
How unethical, immoral and counter productive to want to perma ban ex moderators who are customers.
Did you forget the thread title so quickly?
Permanent Bans for Ex moderation when they Break the rules
sounds like an ism to me
this sounds like slander and also why moderation is so poorly managed, this would also be the kinda thing that certain ex moderators engaging in this type of behavior should be permanently banned from steam, it really gives a bad impression to steam users when you see ex moderators violate simply policy.
This quote would also be a great example of moderation corruption ignoring gas lighting comments.
it is just really a shame that steam which wants to boost its professionalism is so very unprofessional, also seems to me that the only ones responding also have ties to both ex moderators and current ones. suspicious at best.
Slander is spoken, this is print, it'd be Libel. However for it to rise to the level of defamation, one must knowingly engage in spreading information that isn't true. However, you yourself have mentioned time and time again that you aren't a customer, that you have no intention of spending money on Steam.
Guess there is a lack of understanding of the law in addition to the rules with some people...