安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



If a user gets VAC banned and that account can no longer play VAC enabled games, what more does Valve need to do? How is that ignoring it? What do you want to happen?
Deleting unhinged malcontent rants is not covering things up. Letting more users run amok in a different way doesn't benefit anything or solve the core problem.
Kinda seems like you blame Valve for not finding a solution to the human condition. And you ignore the limits of keeping goobers off a platform where creating accounts is free and easy, and from playing a free to play game. Valve can't actually make people play a game to your approval standards. They can't predict or prevent behavior, they can only ban people after they've broken the rules. That may not always happen based on your opinions or timeline.
So not a scam, not dishonesty, not covering things up. Just not letting unhappy users run amok on the forums. Valve doesn't owe you a soapbox.