安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



We can also have as many unwritten rules as required.
lol, point taken ;) ... In that case, maybe try to enforce the existing ones first, like "No Backseat Moderating" which I see all the time, especially regarding the "naming and shaming bit" :p
If we want to say no naming and shaming on the forum then it's no naming or shaming on the forum, its that simple. If needed we can warn you once so you know before taking action.
Here is your warning. No naming and shaming on the forums, Thanks.
Please report any that you see and a moderator will take a look at it. Thanks.
That's not personal information ;)
Fair enough, but I think it should be made clear in the rules in such a case. Anyway, I was just curious, that's all :)
With the amount of information on the internet and people's tendency to stick with an alias, it is very much personal information.
ok fair enough, why in that case, profiles are not systematically locked ? ;)
I'm a cynic, don't take it too personally. ;)