I'd reccomend waiting to see how reviews pan out, could be done well, could be terrible - though hard to say right now

From watching Linus

The choice of LCD is due to Pancake lenses and light loss. Oleds would be too dim.

So I guess the choice is dull colors vs dull blacks.

Further internet sleuthing makes me think the primary reason for it is Battery Life.

I'm still using old TN panel from 2009, i tried two different IPSs briefly and returned them because they make darker games completely unplayable (for example original Amnesia game, all the Thief games). I've also got eye strain from IPS because they have this irritating glow effect which you cannot remove with any settings.

TN panels colors arent so crisp as with IPS panels, but at least black is black. Too bad they stopped making them at least in my country.

引用自 M3 (LS-DOS)：

Nothing breaks immersion faster than dark scenes turning into grey soup.

That is often an issue if you use hdr on low nits displays and has nothing to do with it beeing LCD.

Most displays have great colors & no Black issues in sdr.

引用自 Wolfpig：

引用自 M3 (LS-DOS)：

Nothing breaks immersion faster than dark scenes turning into grey soup.

That is often an issue if you use hdr on low nits displays and has nothing to do with it beeing LCD.

Most displays have great colors & no Black issues in sdr.

Google "IPS glow". This affects every IPS screen.

MicroLED would cost you a small fortune. Good OLED would jack the price up obscenely as well.

Now, before you speak up and mention the PSVR2, for anyone who tries to, it looks horrid due to the poor subpixel count. It drives me bonkers versus the Vive Pro 2.

Density is key for VR. So, to get a good OLED Headset, you're forking our big money. Or dealing with bad sub pixels.

Never had an issue with pixels on psvr2. Mostly the fresnel lenses.

Between HTC vive, quest 2 and pimax 5k+.

Add in GT7, NMS, RE4/8....plugNplay...it's top tier.

Psvr2 pixel density is completely acceptable imo.