安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



This is for WE consolers. Not PC.
You have a friend who will buying your console, Mr Newell
They're in talks with AMD to try and bring FSR4 to RDNA 3 systems. It's already possible to test this out yourself.[www.techpowerup.com] It uses a higher quantized version of the FSR4 files, and seems to provide a balance between FSR4 image quality, and FSR 3.1 performance. I wouldn't be surprised in the slightest to see a future update that has it.
Meanwhile, FSR 3.1 is fine for most purposes.
Don't forget 8 GB VRAM
Did valve forget how gamers are against Nvidia and AMD with puny 8 GB VRAM not being enough for modern gaming
You're not going to run modern games maxxed out on this little box anyways so the fact that you will need to drop texture resolution to medium is irrelivant.
This isn't for PC gamers that have 4K gaming PC's with 2K gpu's but as a entree level gaming PC that also fits into the console like ecosphere.
If the price is anything higher then 500-600$ this gabecube is DOA, especially since we'll have other mini pc's like BEELINK to compare it with.
This is a Pro-Gamer move towards optimization.
Increasing the VRAM of the Steam Machine would be anti-consumer, exacerbating the VRAM issues by not calling for optimization.
NVIDIA, AMD, and the Developers and Publishers need to be on the same page. This "Can it Run Crysis" mentality of requiring more VRAM than the mid-range GPUs is hostile to the consumer, especially given recessions and inflation.
8GB on the Steam Machine is a win for consumers, if this thing takes off enough to be adopted by the industry as a standard going forward into the era of a tech plateau.
Surely that's a different market though? The Steam Deck was aimed at an audience that wanted their pc games in their hands to take wherever they go. The Steam Machine is going for couch gamers. With this product, it's going to be hard to enter that market when it's performance seems to be on the same level as the PS5 and Series X that released 5 years ago.
A lot of (most) PC owners aren't "enthusiasts". Pretty clear from the hardware survey.
Of course, non-enthusiasts would just have their regular PC, likely wouldn't notice or care about a Steam box.
Realistically it is going to be priced around Steam Deck OLED price and above so $400 to $800 give or take
The point is 8 GB VRAM is not enough for most modern 1080p games nowadays maybe for lower end indie game tier and older game title
This is the exact point
Past launch of steam deck was competitive price, value and performance wise compared to previous 2022 UMPC niche gaming market but with launch of Steam machine with poor specs is not wise when demands and requirements are lot higher
Steam deck made perfect business, technical and gaming sense which is not the case with Steam machine in current market
Steam Machine is competing or will compete against niche UMPC market to DIY PC market, consoles and normal PC market without the major benefit of them in pricing, performance or value
Clocking 7400M tier 30W GPU to 100W GPU ain't going to save it
Valve engineers should've secured the Ryzen AI 385 or older gen Ryzen 7945HS/HX tier Soc