安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



war thunder you can pay and still lose every game.
Having the ability to pay for a slight advantage rarely means that one has the skill to make use of said advantage. At least, that's my opinion.
It's pay-to-win but somewhat tolerable to me. The other guy is kinda right, World of Tanks is the closest thing and it's arguably worse in this regard.
You still need to learn how to use the vehicle to use it effectively.
Having a Modern era tank does not mean your invincible against a WW1 era tank.
Isn't WoT the one where people keep leaking classified documents to win online arguments on reddit?
That's War Thunder.
World of Tanks is the casual one
WarGaming patent 8425330B1
https://patents.google.com/patent/US8425330B1/en
https://patents.google.com/patent/US20200114268A1/en
https://old-wiki.warthunder.com/Matchmaker
There's nothing casual.