安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



Both parties must agree on the specs, and sure they are already accepted, but there's no way Valve has no control over that, that's not how things work my man
Valve knows more than you. Just fyi.
The problem ultimately will be price. If your target price is X, you put the best hardware you can at that price point. But a few more GB of VRAM or RAM, a few more CPU cores. A little bit extra storage. All the changes every user thinks is critical for success adds up, the cost and thus the price goes up.
If the price goes up, will more people buy the machine?
The other issue is, the more opinionated the hardware enthusiast is, dollars to donuts they're never going to buy the hardware anyway because they'll always be able to build a better machine for the same or less money.... So those opinions don't really matter. They're probably not the target demographic.
And time will tell if less opinionated, non-hardware enthusiast people will bite at the hardware being offered.
But yeah, anyone expecting the machine to be a PS5 Pro killer or the world's most perfect/optimal prebuilt, well there's a reason why you weren't involved in the project.
Yeah man what a shame tbh