安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
1 
举报此帖
Indeed, there are other options nowadays without the DRM.
Valve doesn't want trading to be a type of commerce for users. It never has.
If Valve was against commerce, there wouldn't be trading.
And without third-party trading sites, there are hardly any ways to properly advertise that you're interested in buying or selling a particular piece of item. Steam doesn't really offer those spaces.
That's the commerce. They even list using your account for commerce as against the ToS.
So with TF2 for example you have a site like bptf which is a trading site, and then you have marketplacetf which is a marketplace site. They operate very differently.
Why should we actively kill sites people are using to trade digital items for other digital items? That to me seems like the kind of community engagement that introducing trading is supposed to create.
Community marketplace serves such purpose (trading for funds) and it already has a lot of security mechanisms implemented in it.
Because it has never been supported and the overwhelming majority of those sites are used to scam. They are the reason Valve have to introduce these measures in the first place. So if they finally manage to kill off third party-trading, then brilliant. It'll be a time to celebrate.
See, you think trading is only about making money. The kind of trading Valve want on their platform is the old schoolyard style trading where you trade the collectible you don't need with someone who needs it and has one you need. No money and no profit involved.
As for the market place, that, too, is only for wallet funds not for making real world bank. It's meant to be a closed system. The money stays on Steam.
But I do think the ability for repercussions of scams would make itself present. As it stands, scammers basically get defended by Steam support. I'm not saying people should feel safe making deals haphazardly, but again, I've had quite a few friends get run over, and because Valve refuses to moderate that particular avenue of trade, there's never a reasonable outcome.
i think you are right. i agree
Maybe this is just me but... seems quite obvious it would lead to larger scenes.
Like what else would you possibly expect to happen?
If it is a problem now, it's a self-inflicted problem that they've themselves created throughout the past decade. Because many games with lootboxes don't allow you to trade the digital items on your account or there is extremely limited trading.