安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题



As I see it, if a post has been quiet for several weeks and is bumped without actually adding anything valid to the topic, it's a necro.
But if somebody replies with something productive which naturally continues the topic, it might still be a necro but it's totally fine.
The problem is, people will often post something and then be told "why start a new topic? Don't you know how to use the search button?" But then if they DO search and find a topic they're looking for, they get "nice necro, why revive that when you could just start a new topic?
As a general rule of thumb, if somebody posts something in an older thread that's on-point, current, and relevant to the topic, it shouldn't be an issue.
it's getting ridic
Mods usually treat anything over a month old as a necro
I say if it's over a month old and the thread isn't on the best page, don't respond to it. The people who think they're contributing usually just added something asinine
locked for "old and confusing" is simply lazy moderation, and there's no consistency to it.
If it adds something to the topic I'd let it go for sure, the usual "Did you get this fixed" or just being snarky at what someone posted 3 years ago on the other hand pretty useless.
Though the mods taking that into account might just be wishful thinking :P
Like your GPU architecture wasn't even conceived of when the game reached end of support, no ♥♥♥♥ a workaround for a completely unrelated GPU won't work.
People are suggesting that posters read one of the dozen or so threads that are still on the front page of the forum about the topic where the question has been answered already, not suggesting that the poster reply to those threads.
To avoid "confusion""
Like we can't read dates.....t