安装 Steam						
					
				
				
									登录
											 | 
						语言
						
																																															繁體中文(繁体中文)
																													日本語(日语)
																													한국어(韩语)
																													ไทย(泰语)
																													български(保加利亚语)
																													Čeština(捷克语)
																													Dansk(丹麦语)
																													Deutsch(德语)
																													English(英语)
																													Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
																													Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
																													Ελληνικά(希腊语)
																													Français(法语)
																													Italiano(意大利语)
																													Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
																													Magyar(匈牙利语)
																													Nederlands(荷兰语)
																													Norsk(挪威语)
																													Polski(波兰语)
																													Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
																													Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
																													Română(罗马尼亚语)
																													Русский(俄语)
																													Suomi(芬兰语)
																													Svenska(瑞典语)
																													Türkçe(土耳其语)
																													Tiếng Việt(越南语)
																													Українська(乌克兰语)
																									报告翻译问题
							
						
 
											 
													 此主题已被锁定
 此主题已被锁定	 
					 
							 讨论规则及指引
 讨论规则及指引
 举报此帖
 举报此帖


And this has been standard operating procedure on practically every company-operated forum I've used in the last 10+ years.
That was a rare thing until recently, though. I guess they changed their minds or whatever.
Problem: "There are too many threads"
Solution: "Close threads, tell people to make new threads linking to old closed threads, thereby reducing the number of threads"
Yeah, glad to see the power is in the right hands here!
So people do as they're told by Steam, search for a former topic on the subject. They find it, post on it, and then the thread is closed by a Steam mod because "This thread was quite old before the recent post"
if they read it, the answer is in the thread already, and there would be no need to actually post
which would leave the psots where they are while helping a member
if it is an ongoing issue, however, i agree.
it should not only stay open, but have any threads made after moved/consolidated to the oldest one
Heh, Steam being hilarious as usual.
Or perhaps go back a few years and lock all the old threads?
Steam works in mysterious ways.
Apparently, though, it doesn't really matter if the new post is pointless or a great revelation to solve all issues of mankind. They'll lock it anyway.
This is getting out of hand and was never a general rule. Locking threads to "avoid confusion " god yeah ok but threads with content that is still up to date and meaningful locked up because Best Before reached. F it