安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题


If it were up to me, I'd make them fixed (not turreted), and only mountable on heavy ships. On one hand I think it would be neat to restrict them to spine only mounts, but that would require having to redo the entire weapon system so I think we can safely rule that one out.
Another aspect that might be interesting is having them greatly increase the heat of the ship firing them due to the relatively greater amount of heat generated versus convention projectiles.
And lastly, to balance out their high projectile velocity, I'd steal borrow from Elite:Dangerous, and introduce some sort of charge up/spool up time that can be attributed to having to charge up the railgun's capacitors.
These variants would have significantly superior tracking, accuracy and importantly: range versus meteroites, while being significantly inferior versus spaceships.
I'm reminded how during WW2 tank designs were built around thicker and heavier armor, only for them to get lighter and thinner post-war as the anti-tank weapons increased in penetration power to the point of making lumbering armor obsolete.
As a compromise, maybe military ships could have the option of spaced armor and composite armor (alá Chobham armor) as expensive, high-tech tree options. I'd also imagine that any corporation capable of producing such armor would be extremely hesitant to sell it to other corps.
Thinking out loud and brainstorming ideas like these is real fun :>