安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
2 
举报此帖
Generally no, but enabling Going Viral for any mission that didn't come with that DLC can considerably increase the difficulty of the scenario due to disease outbreaks. You may also want to avoid enabling Lobbyistico and the Llama of Wall Street since Lobbyistico's 'Corruption' mechanics penalize playing with the Swiss money / Broker side of the game to the point that it's rarely worth engaging with them while the Llama of Wall Street introduces market fluctuations that can make getting your economy up and running more difficult, especially early on when you don't have a lot of choice in what you export and having the price of a key export like Rum collapse can severely impact your revenues.
Other than that, the DLCs mostly don't actually do anything that significantly impacts the game, they just add some more industries or alternative housing options or other things like that.