安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题


Now BM is still really neat and CC have done nothing to make it bad. But it doesn't meet what made HL:1 so good. I know it's also a re-imagining but it wouldn't harm BM at all to add a few intrinsic values and nuances from Half-Life.
I hope it's not against Valve's agreement with CC to modify/allow fans to have greater mod accessibility so we can access the AI to do those improvements ourselves.
edit: Also, not every game will run well on older/newer PC. If you are using Vulkan, it's fairly underdeveloped because of NVIDIA so it will provide better performance but inconsistency issues with lag spikes. Other games that have it don't even run at all with it... So it's great BM's actually operates even with issues.
This is so made up.
BM is one of the best remakes from HL Universe, and is still the best one, still better than disaster from HL Source.
they're try to reimagine most stuff from HL1, but is impossible to make similar like HL1 since is different engines.
what you have is run and sprint.