安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
2 
举报此帖
truth is though. the market will dictate you to have m$ in your back pocket as new games come along, m$ will be consistently combating the switch by making more annoying features certain game devs think they cant live without. unless youre willing to simply say: "nah, i dont need to play that game, ever." then you will stay dual booted. because new errors and driver issues will be occuring at some point or another, and in a vast majority of cases either wont get fixed due to a lack of linux focused troubleshooters dev side, or a workaround wall community side. you're at the behest of the games capabilities/functions.
Yes, there was a mild learning curve, but using a stable distro like Linux Mint with the Cinnamon desktop environment made the transition mostly painless. I still keep a windows install on my other pc for any unexpected 'can't find a linux app' situation ... just in case.
https://www.gamingonlinux.com/
I use Arch btw.
I arrived at Linux derived from many factors, but mainly (oddly enough) from gaming... keep in mind that gaming back then meant that you had to fiddle with the system configuration in order to get the most out of your games.
That meant messing with the memory system in config.sys and loading certain drivers in autoexec.bat in DOS, and later messing with Windows settings in 3.1 and then the nightmare that became the registry in win9x (and still is, for the most part), before 3D graphics you had to do the most out of your CPU and memory, which back then were expensive (not to the rididiculous point of current GPU pricing, but in some cases really close). 3D gaming became a commodity, and with it also came a whole new breed of instability points and the miriad of settings you had to mess with (depending on your configuration), etc.
It was back then that I learned of this "enthusiasts" operating system which implemented the Unix philosophy (which I had no idea what it meant back then) to the common desktop PC with a 386 or newer x86 CPU, which was very efficient with memory management and that supported multitasking from a DOS-like (TTY) interface... and got hooked. Then learned about how to fiddle with the X settings (in XFree86) to get pretty graphics on my desktop, and then about the OSS (Open Sound Sysyem) for my sound card, later (in 2.6) ditched in favor of ALSA (Advanced Linux Sound Architecture), like XFree86, created and swapped out of licensing issues.
At any rate I was so invested in this new system, and fed up with Win9x issues, that I simply stayed and oddly and ironically enough, switched my gaming fix needs to consoles, while keeping an eye for the occasional game with Linux support, like Shogo, Unreal Tournament, Quake 2 and 3, and a few (quite a few) others. Limiting my Windows gaming experience (and hence missing out on much of the PCMR scene).
I had my PC gaming dopamine rush out of games I could make run in Wine and tweaking the hell out of it (and the kernel with custom kernel builds and library builds for my games)... until real life kicked in and I had to make a choice, and chose to stay on Linux (as the poor student I was at the time), and I do not regret it one bit.
Had I known it was as easy as it was, I’d of switched years ago. Everyone kept saying Linux is hard to use so I was nervous. They’re all full of ♥♥♥♥. Linux is easy if you actually know how to use a PC.