Interesting idea though the issue is that shard cost ramps up really fast (well did when I was playing the game actively a few months ago) so one expensive card can distort the deck rating.Also my impression was shard cost was way out of line with the strength of the card. The more rare cards weren't that much stronger. (Later updates since I played might have changed that.)

I was thinking of an idea that used rarity as a basis, say 3 points for a common rune, 4 for an uncommon, 5 for the next level etc. Also add another 1 for a level 2 card and 2 for a level 3 card. That way the point total more accurately reflects the overall strength of the deck.

This point total could also be used as a basis for pvp matches or using decks of players for matching, but have the AI play the deck (a modified pvp like in Gems of War).

引用自 Storm_Chasee：

I was thinking of an idea that used rarity as a basis, say 3 points for a common rune, 4 for an uncommon, 5 for the next level etc. Also add another 1 for a level 2 card and 2 for a level 3 card. That way the point total more accurately reflects the overall strength of the deck.

This point total could also be used as a basis for pvp matches or using decks of players for matching, but have the AI play the deck (a modified pvp like in Gems of War).

Yeah that would probably work better for rating decks. I just used the shard cost because I had just came from there when I had the idea.