安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
3 
举报此帖
Certain levels would require certain skill-profiles, and the game would have to be balanced around the idea of "bringing skills/items into the level from outside" rather than: "bringing in experience and knowledge by playing the game enough."
Personally, I think if a game needs these sort of superficial addons, then the basic gameloop has failed completely.
It's like an RPG where your character walks so slowly, you pour all of your points into run speed. That's just not what makes a game fun.
Instead, it'd make loads of more sense to "complicate" the game by adding more demands of what it takes to "repair a ship", in a way that is fun, and not a huge chore (like later levels of Overcooked, where the hurdle was "annoying level design" rather than "more interesting recipes" or "level puzzles".)
What is "fun" and what is a "chore", though, is a point of contention...Anyway, I totally don't agree about passive skills buffs, or active skill buffs.