安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文（繁体中文）
日本語（日语）
한국어（韩语）
ไทย（泰语）
български（保加利亚语）
Čeština（捷克语）
Dansk（丹麦语）
Deutsch（德语）
English（英语）
Español-España（西班牙语 - 西班牙）
Español - Latinoamérica（西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲）
Ελληνικά（希腊语）
Français（法语）
Italiano（意大利语）
Bahasa Indonesia（印度尼西亚语）
Magyar（匈牙利语）
Nederlands（荷兰语）
Norsk（挪威语）
Polski（波兰语）
Português（葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙）
Português-Brasil（葡萄牙语 - 巴西）
Română（罗马尼亚语）
Русский（俄语）
Suomi（芬兰语）
Svenska（瑞典语）
Türkçe（土耳其语）
Tiếng Việt（越南语）
Українська（乌克兰语）
报告翻译问题
讨论规则及指引
5 
举报此帖
It's EA. if you don't have faith in further development then wait it out and see it unfold till release before you buy it. Not sure what else there is to be anxious about for this to be 'dead'.
Well if you are foolish enough to buy on subjective review - then No one can really help you.
I was initially unimpressed when I found out this game was sold on Epic first and it's actually a year old. It is now being revised and improved as a Steam Early Access game. After reading the devs responses though, and looking more into the gameplay of what is on offer at the moment in the EA version of the game, I was impressed enough to buy it despite my initial misgivings. I will be writing a critical review of the EA version in due course.
A balanced view. If people don't like Epic - well thst's their choice - Just as it is Stardock's choice where to launch/sell their product
Nah. 28 reviews just means the game is selling like dog water. I don't really care if they are positive or not. If it sells so poorly it will likely be abandonded quickly.
Yep. But with an educated guess, you can extrapolate that number into copies sold. It's a good indication.
To verify, I just checked steamcharts. And there are indeed only a couple hundred people playing with a peak of just over 350 players. This game is truelly dead on arrival.
Now, it depends on how much money it is costing the devs whether or not this game will still be alive in a few months time. If it's indie enough, it might survive for longer. I don't like abandonwear, so I will not buy this game until It is fleshed out enough to no longer require additional content, balance changes and bug fixes.
I'm sure that the peak 350 players will be happy to be described as dead players.
If you are convinced its DOA - the WHY did you bother asking? See ya have a good life
OK, so the GalCiv series is Stardock CEO (Brad Wardell, aka Draginol, aka Frogboy) pet project for 30 years - no way is it going to get abandoned. I imagine Brad is currently like a kid in a sweet shop playing with the advances in AI technology (AI development really is his thing), so will be wanting to incorporate as much as he can into GC4.
Stardock have a history of long development support for their games, and the final version is usually far superior than the initial release. Expect a few years of major updates and expansions and continued minor tweaks and fixes for a number of years beyond - probably until GC5 is released.
That it's early access doesn't bug me, but reading the forums, and seeing that people need epic online login and can't have epic blocked to use all the features is a red flag for me. If I didn't want anything to do with epic last year, why would that change this year? And it could be all blown smoke, but I am not taking the word of day 1 reviews by fanboys who have spent next to no time with it, nor the word of the devs who tried to get me to bounce yet again to another platform (impulse to steam to epic)
So once people really dig in, and we get to see what is what, then I will consider it
Oh no, you have nothing to say so you just call me a troll. Truelly bringing nothing to the conversation. Rather pathetic.
Only sensible comment in this entire thread, and the reason I made the post in the first place. If what you say is true then my worries of this getting abandoned have lowered substantially.