安装 Steam
登录
|
语言
繁體中文(繁体中文)
日本語(日语)
한국어(韩语)
ไทย(泰语)
български(保加利亚语)
Čeština(捷克语)
Dansk(丹麦语)
Deutsch(德语)
English(英语)
Español-España(西班牙语 - 西班牙)
Español - Latinoamérica(西班牙语 - 拉丁美洲)
Ελληνικά(希腊语)
Français(法语)
Italiano(意大利语)
Bahasa Indonesia(印度尼西亚语)
Magyar(匈牙利语)
Nederlands(荷兰语)
Norsk(挪威语)
Polski(波兰语)
Português(葡萄牙语 - 葡萄牙)
Português-Brasil(葡萄牙语 - 巴西)
Română(罗马尼亚语)
Русский(俄语)
Suomi(芬兰语)
Svenska(瑞典语)
Türkçe(土耳其语)
Tiếng Việt(越南语)
Українська(乌克兰语)
报告翻译问题
Honestly I don't see they doing it with Hades 2 either. I think they have nice ethics for not creating a "cash cow".
But I wouldn't mind at all if they created a new game with co-op in mind, with the possibility for DLCs etc.
True, but hey, before Hades 2, they had never done a sequel neither...
Live and learn, as they say.
Exactly.
This is why I said that I wouldn't mind if they made a different game to test things they've never done, like co-op and/or a game with DLCs in mind.
But the thing that I expect the least from SGG is turning one of their games (past or future) into a "cash cow".
Cash cow sounds negative, but it can also mean the studio can do what they are good at and us paying for that to get what we love :) !
pfff thinking of Co-op hades 2 that would be something I would like to see haha XD forever dreaming.
No but again I'm loving the work they put into it and hades 2 is really good at everything it's doing, just thinking of the possibilities.